Talk:Sörla þáttr

Reference removal

In response to this edit: [1], you are indeed correct and I ought to have been more distinct, though I presumed that was in the additional reference, which was brought over from another article as this one was lacking them. The Lindow reference is in relation to the manuscript information. I see you've removed the other reference though, so I assume you are more familiar with it. Either way, good for it to be clarified. :bloodofox: (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

I kind of thought we didn't need an excursus on the Flateyjarbók here and that if we did a 1906 book wasn't the way to go. I guess I could check out that edition but it'd be a pain in the ass - I'd have to go to a special section of the national library to request it. And the editor who added this reference didn't give any page numbers, further slowing down such an effort. Haukur (talk) 23:10, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Sounds reasonable enough to me. :bloodofox: (talk) 23:15, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Probably wrong iw

There are two tættir known as "Sörla þáttr", and even another islandic medieval text called Sörla saga sterka (see heimskringla.no). This article deals with the legendary saga known as Sörla þáttr eða Heðins saga ok Högna from Flateyjarbók, and so does also es:wp and ja:wp

The is:wp article deals with another tættir known as Sörla þáttr (Brodd-Helgasonar), known from Ljósvetninga saga (better explained at is:Ljósvetninga saga). I suggest that steps should be taken to sort out this iw-error. The easiest way would probably be to

1. move this article to Sörla þáttr eða Heðins saga ok Högna
2. make an disambiguation page for Sörla þáttr, and
3. start a short article about Sörla þáttr (Brodd-Helgasonar), to guide the is:wp iw.

OK? I cn help if needed. Bw --Orland (talk) 21:17, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

I chose this option: full title in leadin, and a top notice {{see also}}. Bw --Orland (talk) 16:52, 19 June 2012 (UTC)