Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2020 and 15 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Alfonzo Plascencia. Peer reviewers: TDLyon.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 10:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Page moved by User:Marudubshinki. Rehman(+) 04:02, 8 April 2010 (UTC)Reply


The article needs to be moved to São Francisco River to conform with the name of the other Brazilian river articles. Also, it is easier to English speakers to find the article named in this way. Regards, Carioca 17:55, 30 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

English Sao Francisco River

edit

Today I uploaded my version of the English Sao Francisco River. Somehow I got the name right! I have left the original content intact, because the writer had historic niceties that should stay. My goal was to extend the article, especially with data from brazilian government agencies. Somehow the info/river does not work yet as is the case with the images. I see that I have some tidying up to do! Gerard Pieter Koenraadt 17:23, 21 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Saint Franciscus

edit

Someone drew my attention to the fact that in de Encyclopedia Brittanica it is written that the river was named after Saint Franciscus of Borgia instead of snt Franciscus of Assisi. The Portuguese page has Assisi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.2.160.178 (talk) 16:42, 31 May 2009 (UTC)Reply