Talk:Ruy González de Clavijo

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

>>> 11:36, 23 October 2007 FisherQueen (Talk | contribs) (38 bytes) (Is there a reason you want two identical articles about the same person? Please discuss on talk page before reverting)

The point is that Gonzáles is the wrong spelling and González is the right one. It is just an elementary Spanish language (either modern or medieval) fact.

Therefore, the right arrangement in Wikipedia is to put the full article text in "González", and redirect "Gonzáles" there. And this is what I intended and what I am pretty sure I did. Of course, for a short time there was some inconsistency while I finished to edit both entries.

Do you agree, now?

I don't mind much which one is the main article and which is the redirect; feel free to switch them. Somehow between us, we had them fixed so they each redirected to the other, which was entertaining but not informative :). I changed it so there was one article and one redirect, but I don't care if you change which is the article and which is the redirect. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:25, 23 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ruy González de Clavijo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:28, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply