Talk:Rutherfordium

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Double sharp in topic To update chemistry
Good articleRutherfordium has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 15, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
October 23, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
November 23, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
March 5, 2011Good article nomineeListed
March 30, 2011Good topic candidatePromoted
April 19, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
May 16, 2022Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Good article

November 2016 RIKEN chemical study edit

Here. Double sharp (talk) 10:05, 24 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

The article is pretty short though; it's basically another comparison of Rf with its true homologue Hf and its pseudohomologue Th. Double sharp (talk) 03:09, 25 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Rutherfordium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:59, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

To update chemistry edit

Link. Double sharp (talk) 09:06, 10 April 2021 (UTC)Reply