Talk:Rutherford model

Latest comment: 2 months ago by Johnjbarton in topic 3D animation of an atom
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Rutherford model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:32, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Blunder

edit

What is the blunder of Rutherford's atomic nature Max Yusuf (talk) 04:54, 18 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Chemistry

edit

Niel Bohr model of atom 197.215.27.63 (talk) 20:40, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

@197.215.27.63 why alpha particle was not difflected by electrons? Kanchan Kothari (talk) 17:01, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

3D animation of an atom

edit

The 3D animation is vastly distorted for the purpose of this article. The nucleus is 20,000 to 60,000 times smaller than the electron cloud. See Atomic nucleus. Johnjbarton (talk) 17:52, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply