Talk:Russian monitor Admiral Greig

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Auntieruth55 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Russian monitor Admiral Greig/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 14:57, 10 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Sturm, I'll get to this in the next couple of days or so.....auntieruth (talk) 14:57, 10 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c ([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]y]):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: