Talk:Russian battleship Poltava (1911)/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Buggie111 in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Second opinion requested.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Checking for edit warring.
- Pass/Fail:
Reviewer: WikiCopter (radio • sorties • images • shot down) 22:51, 4 October 2010 (UTC) Comment the link to Gangut is a dablink. Can you address that? WikiCopter (radio • sorties • images • shot down) 22:59, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Edit wars?! Hardly anyone's edited the article in months.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:16, 4 October 2010 (UTC)