Talk:Russian battleship Georgii Pobedonosets/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: WikiCopter (radio • sorties • images • shot down) 21:44, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

Looking good as usual.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Great grammar.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Good for GA, but I prefer a few more sources on my articles.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Good.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Good.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   No recent edit warring.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Good.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Passed.