Talk:Russian Aerospace Defence Forces

File:OEK OKNO.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:OEK OKNO.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:OEK OKNO.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:23, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Russian Aerospace Defence Forces. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120217132002/http://structure.mil.ru/structure/forces/cosmic.htm to http://structure.mil.ru/structure/forces/cosmic.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:08, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Aerospace = Air and space

I'm re-applying an edit previously reverted by @Garuda28 with a more detailed explanation here, concerning the following text:

Although it is officially translated as aerospace in English, it covers both attacks from the air and from (outer) space, and some Russian writers translate it as "air and space" instead.

The middle part of this sentence does not make sense linguistically nor does it add any substantive information to the article. Like I mentioned in the edit summary, 'aerospace' already means 'air and space'; both in Russian and in every variety of English. The text even points to the Aerospace article which exactly states as such. There is also no chance of confusion here which would require defining the term: 'aerospace' is a very common term used by military, civilian-public, and industrial organisations related to aerospace, as exemplified by its own article. Added together, this sentence implies that 'aerospace' has a different meaning or that the Russian meaning of the word differs from the English meaning, neither of which is true nor explained and may simply be the result of the original writer not being familiar with the term. Simply put, there was no 'although' since aerospace and 'air and space' are synonymous, thus the sentence incorrectly implied a contradiction. As the name is alternatively translated into English as 'Air and Space' however, I do think it is useful to keep the latter part of the sentence intact, which is what I have done.

SabasNL (talk) 14:03, 16 March 2023 (UTC)