Talk:Rush (wrestler)/GA1

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Lee Vilenski in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 11:24, 8 January 2019 (UTC)Reply


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 11:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures

edit
  • It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -  N
  • It contains copyright infringements - CopyVio check comes up clean
  • It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). - No tags in article
  • It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. - No notice of edit warring.

First impressions

edit

I will go into more detail later, however, on first inspection, here's what I see:

I've moved this to the bottom of the prose. Seems a better fit Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 09:15, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

I hope this doesn't seem too harsh, and I'll go into the main prose when I have time. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 11:37, 8 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

Prose

edit

Lede

edit
Indeed. I'm pretty sure that's how it works - Fine if proven wrong. You do also use it with {{técnico ("Face", or those that portray the good guys}}, considering "face" is a descriptive term, and not a proper noun regardless. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 09:25, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
You can use United States, just fine. See MOS:NOTUSA for reasonings. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 09:25, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

career

edit

Professional wrestling persona

edit

Notes & References

edit

GA Review

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
Personally, I'm not really sure how the roster of this promotion, and the associated article are particularly notable, but that's not a topic for this GA. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:34, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Article placed on hold. Biggest issues for me are the paragraph layout (4-5 sentences is a paragraph, generally), and some of the wording above. Gramatically, when doing a translation, in brackets, it should still be in lower case. I'll keep this open for a while for the user to update the article/respond. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 11:22, 10 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Lee Vilenski - I think I have addressed all your concerns? MPJ-DK (talk) 01:15, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Sure, I've made a few changes myself to the article, as clear typo in lead, and wikilinking face and heel in the persona section, as well as move the personal life below this section. I think it fits GA standard now. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 09:35, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply