Talk:Ruppert Archaeopteryx

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ruppert Archaeopteryx article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Aircraft / Gliding

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.
	This article is supported by the gliding project.

Switzerland Low‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contributor

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I own one of these machines (serial 003) - see http://swissluijten.com/id14.html RonaldGlider (talk) 16:44, 24 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Welcome aboard, it is always useful to have someone with first hand knowledge of the subject matter. - Ahunt (talk) 08:36, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Broken ref links

Latest comment: 11 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

I noticed that many references on this page are broken links (Ruppert Composite has revamped their website in Feb 2012) RonaldGlider (talk) 20:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Let me run the checklink tool and see what comes up. - Ahunt (talk) 23:29, 24 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

It identified seven dead links, let me try to fix them now! - Ahunt (talk) 23:46, 24 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Done - Ahunt (talk) 00:01, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

I found all the references that had been tagged as missing and reorganized the development timeline into one paragraph. See what you think of that approach. - Ahunt (talk) 11:29, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Flytec 6030

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Great! I added a link to the avionics -- is this the way to do it? I have not found out how to do this with the double square brackets... RonaldGlider (talk) 06:55, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

I had to remove it. As per WP:EL external links are not used in article text. I could have converted it to a reference but the web page doesn't mention that the unit is used in the Archaeopteryx, so it isn't a useful ref. I did add this ref though, which does prove the unit is used on the aircraft. - Ahunt (talk) 08:36, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic