Talk:Ruger Super Redhawk

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

cleanup and clarification

edit

This article reads somewhat like an advertisement. Also, the feed system is listed simply as "cylinder." Can this be clarified to fixed or swing-out cylinder? 141.219.208.43 (talk) 18:30, 9 November 2012 (UTC)Reply


Split proposal

edit

I propose this article be split, with the background information going to a new Ruger double action revolvers article, and the SR specific stuff staying here. The SR would be a breif blurb in the general article, with a pointer to here. The SP-101, GP-100, and others could be covered in the general article, and if enough information accrues on those models, they can be spun off into separate articles. scot 15:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ruger Super Redhawk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:56, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply