This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The criticism section appears to be original research and synthesis not appropriate to Wikipedia. It seems a useful section to have, and I suggest replacing it with something that cites sources which criticize Rudi's prognostications and refer to him by name. And surely there must be some that have good things to say. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 00:02, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Ditto. It is obvious what the opinion of the author of the criticism section is, so it's POV and OR. A criticism section would be worthwhile, if anyone has ever criticized him in print, but as it is this section needs to be reverted. I'll give a little time for someone to clean it up, though, in lieu of reverting. Duoduoduo (talk) 20:44, 27 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Rudi Dornbusch/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
This article has a detailed person infobox and a reasonable biography though nowhere are there citations to verifiable sources for this information. There is a criticism section which has original research and analysis not appropriate to Wikipedia. Such a section would be useful to include if it cited sources analyzing Dornbusch by name, and it should be much less POV than the current one. A portrait would be good. And perhaps there are additional economics infoboxes lying about which would be appropriate here. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 00:09, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Last edited at 00:09, 31 January 2009 (UTC).
Substituted at 05:02, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
