Talk:Rubio's Coastal Grill

Untitled

Sadly, the Rubio's restaurant in Oregon is no more. I am removing Oregon from the list on this page. - gerb

"Frivolous lawsuit" characterization

I marked the "frivolous lawsuit" sentence with a "citation needed." It makes a difference whether that characterization was made by an independent and qualified observer, or by an interested party (say, a lawyer for Rubio's, or a propagandist for some legal think-tank representing corporate interests against the interests of consumer-plaintiffs). Notice that the sentence in question uses the passive voice, thereby avoiding saying who made that characterization. Bruce Tindall 00:42, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

One doesn't have to be a corporate shill to see the insanity of this lawsuit. So the lobster burritos contained squat lobster rather than clawed lubster... they still contined lobster meat. It is a strech to call what Rubios did "deceptive advertizing". But some woman with too much time on her hands goes whining to a bunch of class-action ambulance chasers and all of a sudden the rest of us have to pay more when we eat at Rubios. It may be "the way of things" but that doesn't mean we can't call a spade a spade... just my $0.02... --SpinyNorman 03:45, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

One might also ask "cui bono?" Who might actually be harmed by such advertising, and who might benefit from such a suit? What if "Fred," say, ran a competing restaurant with a product that actually contained what's commonly called "lobster" rather than "langostinos"? I think "Fred" might have a legitimate beef. Or lobster. And perhaps the plaintiff could have been such a competitor, or a front for same. In any case, the current wording of the article has a passive-voice allegation with no Wikipedia-required verifiability. I don't suggest that the characterization of the lawsuit be deleted from the article; just tell the reader who made the characterizaton, and let the reader weigh the characterization in light of who made it. If it's a spokesperson for the Chamber of Commerce of the U.S., a reader might come to one conclusion; if it's a highly-respected law professor specializing in advertising and known for objectivity, a reader might come to another. Bruce Tindall 23:42, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:RubiosLogo.png

Image:RubiosLogo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

WP:FOOD Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Restaurants or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. You can find the related request for tagging here -- TinucherianBot (talk) 11:01, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Rubio's Coastal Grill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050224023837/http://www.qsrmagazine.com/issue/41/borderline.phtml to http://www.qsrmagazine.com/issue/41/borderline.phtml
• Added archive https://archive.is/20130416002949/http://www.ucsdguardian.org/sports/swimming-a-diving/item/1959-successcameinsandiegonowralphrubiogivesback to http://www.ucsdguardian.org/sports/swimming-a-diving/item/1959-successcameinsandiegonowralphrubiogivesback

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:44, 8 January 2018 (UTC)