Talk:Rube Goldberg Machine Contest

Terrible

This article is terrible. The first sentence tells us who sponsors the contest and who financially backs it. Then it goes on to tell where it is held. How about saying what the contest is in the intro paragraph? 74.93.230.113 (talk) 20:26, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

??

in 2007 they used 345 step. then in in 2011 they break the 230-step record by using 244 steps??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.160.127.10 (talk) 22:05, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rube Goldberg Machine Contest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080406000907/http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/04/05/goldberg.contest.ap/index.html to http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/04/05/goldberg.contest.ap/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:34, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

On recent redirection

Just my impression: independently notable; needs more sources but I don't see a reason why this shouldn't work as a standalone article. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 11:01, 29 November 2018 (UTC)