Talk:Royal Rumble (2004)

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Royal Rumble (2004) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from Royal Rumble (2004) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 December 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the match for the WWE Championship at Royal Rumble (2004) was booked after Brock Lesnar legitimately broke his opponent's neck?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/December.

Wikipedia

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Professional wrestling#Disqualification|disqualified]] The anchor (#Disqualification) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[Professional wrestling#Draw|draw]] The anchor (#Draw) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[Professional wrestling throws#Military press slam|Military Press]]
[[Professional wrestling throws#Double leg slam|Alabama Slam]] The anchor (#Double leg slam) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Professional wrestling Low‑importance

	Royal Rumble (2004) is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philadelphia Low‑importance

	Philadelphia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Past Rumble Winners:Chris Benoit edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Should it be noted that Chris Benoit is not on the past rumble winners list? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.67.7.141 (talk) 05:45, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

No. It's already mentioned on the Benoit murder-suicide article that WWE removed almost all references on their site to him (though they seem to have put some back). TJ Spyke 06:06, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Filtered Order of Elimination edit

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

When I try to organize when each man was eliminated from the match in order from the first to final elimination, there's a bit of a hiccup.

Currently on the screen when I sort the eliminations in order it goes:

5. Steiner 6. Kane 8. Rhyno 7. Spike Dudley 9. Matt Hardy 10. René Duprée

I'd try to correct it but I don't want to screw up the table it's on. Anyone else, feel free to correct it if you know how. PopCultureMan (talk) 02:20, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic