Talk:Royal Indian Navy/Archive 1

Archive 1

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Royal Indian Navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:32, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 11 June 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 19:27, 18 June 2018 (UTC)


Royal Indian Navy (1612–1950)Royal Indian Navy – The current name is convoluted and not needed, since there are no other Royal Indian Navy to differentiate from. Skjoldbro (talk) 19:07, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Support move, for reasons stated by Skjoldbro. Onel5969 TT me 22:54, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Support for the above stated reason. Adamgerber80 (talk) 15:35, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Support agree with proposer Lyndaship (talk) 15:52, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Support, the current title is quite convoluted and the proposal makes sense. Gatemansgc (TɅ̊LK) 19:52, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.