Talk:Royal Dublin Society

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Fayenatic london in topic Abandoned user draft

Old post edit

I changed the text from "The Royal Dublin Society was founded" to "The Dublin Society was founded". The prefix 'Royal' was added to the name almost a century later (1820) just as Dublin has had 'mayors' for centuries longer than it has had "lord mayors".

Capacity of the stadium edit

Does anybody know the capacity of the stadium? Wikipediarules2221 06:06, 12 November 2006 (UTC) Depending on the layout it can accomadate 20 - 35,000Reply

Merge proposal edit

There is little point in having a two line description on the Simmonscourt arena separately from the main RDS article. ww2censor (talk) 02:13, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. I think a merge/redirect is the way to go. Guliolopez (talk) 16:19, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Agree. Sarah777 (talk) 09:43, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
I agree to merge the RDS Simmonscourt pavilion into Royal Dublin Society. Please mention that the show jumping horses are stabled in the Simmonscourt pavilion during Dublin Horse Show week. - Culnacréann-(talk) 19:35, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Agree. In addition to the reasons above, there are several other venues at the RDS which don't have separate entries. Vernacula (talk) 23:40, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Guliolopez, now we just need to expand the article. ww2censor (talk) 04:28, 27 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merge/redirect completed per apparent consensus on 26 Jan. Guliolopez (talk) 15:02, 27 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merge proposal (again) edit

See what amounts to a repeat of the above discussion here: Talk:RDS (stadium). Additional contributions requested to confirm a consensus (one way or the other). Guliolopez (talk) 16:25, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Still agree - or rather 'agree again'. Sarah777 (talk) 21:09, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Agree again: there is no need for a separate article as the "stadium" is an integral part of the RDS. remerge as soon as possible. ww2censor (talk) 01:31, 26 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

RDS Politics? edit

According to George Noble Plunkett, the RDS threw Count Plunkett out of the society after his son, Joseph Mary Plunkett had been revealed as a leader of the Easter Rising. Is this true? Was this some sort of loyalist institution? Even today, are seats on the RDS governing body reserved for Protestant churches? Does anybody know who the dominant figures in the RDS were when Plunkett was thrown out? The politics of this organisation definitely has to be addressed in this article for the sake of getting a full picture. 109.78.46.207 (talk) 02:04, 9 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Royal Dublin Society. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:53, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Abandoned user draft edit

User:Plavin/sandbox is an abandoned user draft expansion of this article. Please would an interested editor incorporate what is useful, then blank that page as WP:COPYARTICLE, and leave a note here when done? – Fayenatic London 11:10, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply