Talk:Royal Canadian Armoured Corps

In 1936 several regiments were designated (Tank) regiments during the Militia-wide reorganizations. They were still considered part of the infantry, however, hence my edit of the reference to the Windsor Regiment on 23 Feb 2006. Michael Dorosh 18:20, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

RCAC vs Armour Branch

Is the personnel branch, called Armour Branch in CFAOs, identical to or merely conflated with the RCAC? I see the two are often used interchangeably, even on CF sites, but what is the official branch name? SigPig 06:23, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

The guys at army.ca might know - a post there in the Armour forum should find you an answer. I thought the official name was "armour branch" after unification but that RCAC remained in informal use and has crept back towards being official, but that is a wild assed guess. Michael Dorosh 07:31, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

RCAC regiments that exist, but only on paper

With the recent change of The Halifax Rifles (RCAC) from being on the inactive list to being stood up in cadre strength, a list of the inactive regiments of the corps should be posted and explained on the page lostmuskrat (talk) 02:27, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

There is a list of these regiments at Supplementary Order of Battle, but I'm not sure it's 100% complete. This article should either have a link to Supplementary Order of Battle or include the list of SOB armoured regiments directly. Indefatigable (talk) 02:22, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Royal Canadian Armoured Corps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130524034138/http://www.forces.gc.ca/site/mobil/news-nouvelles-eng.asp?id=4730 to http://www.forces.gc.ca/site/mobil/news-nouvelles-eng.asp?id=4730
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131120122730/http://www.army-armee.forces.gc.ca/assets/ARMY_Internet/docs/en/canadian-army-journal/volume-14/CAJ_Vol14.3_06_e.pdf to http://www.army-armee.forces.gc.ca/assets/ARMY_Internet/docs/en/canadian-army-journal/volume-14/CAJ_Vol14.3_06_e.pdf
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.army-armee.forces.gc.ca/assets/ARMY_Internet/docs/en/canadian-army-journal/volume-15/caj-vol15-1-10-e.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080807043133/http://www.recruiting.forces.gc.ca/ to http://www.recruiting.forces.gc.ca/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:43, 27 December 2017 (UTC)