Talk:Roughness length

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Guiltyspark in topic Needs section on fluid applications

Opening heading edit

It seems silly to me to tag this page as 'unclear to many readers'. The subject of this page is a technical concept, and demands a technical explanation. The page seems to me to be well written, and as simple as possible given its subject.

I entirely agree - it is a somewhat difficult concept which is only really of interest to those taking a fairly detailed interest in atmospheric physics. About the only thing I would add are some typical values for different terrain etc with the corresponding wind profiles over say 0 to 10 metres. Colin Mill (talk) 11:04, 13 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

suggestion: —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.47.71.253 (talk) 13:29, 13 May 2008 (UTC) The roughness length is the height in meters going towards the ground at which the wind speed theoretically becomes zero. This point is a mathematical point that only exists in theory. In reality the wind at this height no longer follows a mathematical logarithm ?Reply

suggestion: add category "fluid dynamics"? User:Nickcampbell18 —Preceding undated comment added 18:07, 15 January 2010 (UTC).Reply

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:36, 28 October 2011 (UTC)Reply



Roughness LengthRoughness length

Per WP:CAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. Tony (talk) 13:59, 21 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • Support. Not a proper noun, should not be capitalised. Also, has already been downcased in the article for years. Jenks24 (talk) 06:11, 23 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Needs section on fluid applications edit

e.g. The logarithmic velocity profile   guiltyspark (talk) 21:44, 29 April 2012 (UTC)Reply