Talk:Rotter kidnapping/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: TheBritinator (talk · contribs) 03:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 06:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this, comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Arconning (talk) 06:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Prose and MoS

Infobox and lead

• Change dating system on infobox to dmy, check List of date formats by country as the topic is in Liechtenstein.

 Done

• Lead is a bit short but it's alright.

 Done

• Probably mention the other victims and specify the names of the perpetrators.

Not sure if this is necessary, might convolute the lead a bit.

Background

• by 1933, Nazism in Germany, and in January 1933, due to this, from the press, add comma at the end.

 Done

• Jewish background, pluralize.

 Done

• emigrated, emigrate.

 Done

• as they falsely accused, change to who falsely accused.

 Done

Kidnapping

• along with Alfred's wife, Fritz's domestic partner, Gaflei on the Alps, though once he realized, who was also injured, re-unite with Julie Wolff, add comma at the end.

 Done

• This however, was unsuccessful as they fought back and began to escape on foot., rewrite, probably omit however.

 Done

Trials and aftermath

• Rheinbeger and Frommelt, add comma after Rheinbeger. Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Serial commas, though per the same MoS entry, not really ambiguous therefore it can be kept but I would recommend for it to be added.

 Done

• In October of the same year, Liechtenstein to come to an end, after leave Liechtenstein and, add comma at the end.

 Done

• Italicize mentions of "Stolperstein" in image caption.

 Done

Images

• Images have proper licenses and are relevant.

Refs

• Reference all seem reliable.
• For reference 2, remove the "last=Editorial" as it's not the name of the author. Vice versa with reference 4.

 Done

• For reference 6, when using the wikilinked page of an author, use the "authorlink=" template without the [] brackets for the page of the author, then the "first=" and "last=" for the name of the author, so that it's formatted properly.

 Done

Spotchecks

• Earwig picks like 1% which is like negligible. Manual check shows no sign of copyright violations/plagiarism.

Misc

• No ongoing edit war on the article, focused and broad on the topic considering information about the topic would be a few decades old, no bias seen.
  • @TheBritinator: Here are my comments, hope they can be addressed. Arconning (talk) 15:42, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Addressed the comments, @Arconning:. Let me know if anything more needs done. Thanks. TheBritinator (talk) 18:43, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed