Talk:Ross (1983 album)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ross-83.jpg

Image:Ross-83.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 13:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Needs major cleanup

There are so many non-neutral, unsourced POV statements here, needs a major fix. I'll try and get to it later today. Gusworld (talk) 21:58, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

I've had a first pass at it, removing all the speculative and non-sourced stuff and adding a few chart positions. Gusworld (talk) 05:00, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Unsourced speculation

An IP editor restored this paragraph from an earlier version: "Marred by a poor selection of first singles with the exotic, "Pieces of Ice", the album remains one of the most controversial in her body of work. It has been rumored that it was once a double album. That is hard to envision considering that the album clocks in just a little over 30 minutes. A better selection would have been "Let's Go Up" coupled with a great performance of the song during her Central Park concert and then on Tonight Show a few days later."

None of this is encyclopedic content, hence its removal. A reliably sourced reference to the notion that this was conceived as a double album would certainly be interesting, but I'm not aware of that fact showing up in any properly-researched Ross or Motown reference work. The opinion on single selection is just that -- an opinion -- and not notable unless it can be sourced to a reliable critic. Gusworld (talk) 05:53, 5 January 2011 (UTC)