Talk:Roseville train collision
Latest comment: 9 months ago by BegbertBiggs in topic Requested move 21 October 2023
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 21 October 2023
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 12:52, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Roseville (NSW) collision (1950) → Roseville train collision – The current title contains unnecessary disambiguation by adding the place and year when this seems to be the only notable Roseville collision. Additionally, NSW is an unexplained acronym. I don't really mind if this page is moved to some other similar title, seeing as there seems to be no consistency in railway accident naming in Category:Railway accidents and incidents in New South Wales/ Steelkamp (talk) 09:44, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support: Agree with the strange unnecessary disambiguation. I would have boldly just done the move to be honest. Fork99 (talk) 07:40, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Thryduulf (talk) 09:59, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:05, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.