Talk:Rosemary & Thyme

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Rosemary & Thyme is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Land Rover edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

What year is the Land Rover they drive? Does it require double clutching? --24.94.189.11 02:30, 14 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Belatedly, I have to say this is the Best. Query. Ever. Tsuguya (talk) 10:23, 24 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Rosemary-and-Thyme.jpg edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Image:Rosemary-and-Thyme.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

Done.--UpDown (talk) 17:41, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 12:54, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Clothing design edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This section looks like a PR bit to me. I think this section and the link should be deleted but I don't know the subject matter well enough to be sure that I'm not missing something. Is there a good reason why Yves Barre deserves a mention above all the other designers? Is there even a reason why there is a section on clothing design? If not, then the section should be deleted or expanded to cover clothing design more comprehensively..2.97.9.118 (talk) 18:02, 7 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

I came here to say exactly that. I've never come across a citation for "clothing" before on a Wikipedia entry for a TV show. I'm not sure why that would be noteworthy. And it implies that he only designed the clothing for Pam Ferris's character? The whole thing should be deleted unless anyone can come up with a good reason for it to be there. I could understand it if the costumes were unique and a major feature of the show. Very odd. Sadiemonster (talk) 16:35, 20 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rosemary & Thyme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091024063137/http://www.independent.co.uk:80/news/obituaries/clive-exton-462048.html to http://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/clive-exton-462048.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:11, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Rosemary & Thyme/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

When will Rosemary and Thyme return to TV

Last edited at 22:41, 4 June 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 04:54, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Opening remarks edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The opening remarks that this show is popular because of the the 'modern myth' that the main characters are a lesbian couple is not factual. It is an opinion, not a substantiated fact. Sharing a room is not an indication of a sexual relationship, and is not part of the storyline at all. This opinion should be removed.Orbitercat (talk) 09:19, 2 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Done -- Whats new?^(talk) 09:38, 2 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rosemary & Thyme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080224223845/http://www.rosemaryandthyme.tv/ to http://www.rosemaryandthyme.tv/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:51, 16 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Rosemary & Thyme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:14, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic