Talk:Ronan Farrow

Latest comment: 11 months ago by 2003:E5:7714:D176:9039:5C62:BEC8:1814 in topic H. Clintons behavior against R.F. after he began his research about H. Weinstein

Criticism edit

The penultimate paragraph (about the Ben Smith article) in the "Recognition" section should really be in a "Criticism" section, alongside another paragraph about the critic the New York Post made to Farrow over the cancelation of the Woody Allen memoir publication by Hachette: Farrow previous statements, cancelation. -Kes47 (talk) 08:25, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 22 March 2021 edit

I call your attention to "Journalism" and the penultimate paragraph, the ongoing topic of which is sexual harassment: (1) The penultimate sentence has absolutely nothing to do with sexual harassment. A non sequitur? Why include it? And (2) I propose the following additions to the penultimate paragraph: On September 9, 2018, Moonves resigned from his position as chairman and chief executive of CBS without severance. He was not charged. [1] Three women accused Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct including rape. [2] He was not charged, and he was confirmed to the Supreme Court. [3]Harryawhite (talk) 18:40, 22 March 2021 (UTC) Harryawhite (talk) 18:40, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ deadline.com Les Moonves Won’t Face L.A. D.A. Sex Crime Charges
  2. ^ cnbc.com Kavanaugh accuser Swetnick details parties where girls allegedly raped
  3. ^ time.com The Senate Confirms Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court
  Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit extended-protected}} template. As you stated, the section outlines Farrow's journalism, and the penultimate sentence is part of that. Regarding the sexual harassment allegations, since the article is about Farrow, we only need to include events that involve him and his reporting. It would not be appropriate to include details about ensuing events that do not involve Farrow. That said, you're more than welcome to open a discussion to propose the inclusion of said details if you'd like. KyleJoantalk 02:11, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Another RS discussing paternity edit

https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2021-06-08/frank-sinatra-ronan-farrow-paternity-biographer-tony-oppedisano

--Artificial Nagger (talk) 19:25, 12 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Bibliography edit

I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section:

  • Cite templates will be used where possible.
  • I prefer capitalization and punctuation to follow the standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, rather than "title case".
  • Links (either direct or indirect) to potentially unreliable or incomplete digitised copies and to booksellers may be removed.

This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 05:29, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

H. Clintons behavior against R.F. after he began his research about H. Weinstein edit

One of the largest German daily newspaper (producing so called "quality journalism" -- in German: "Qualitätsjournalismus"), Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, reported that Hillary Clinton allegedly ended the contact to Farrow in 2017, since and because he began his research on the accusations against Harvey Weinstein. Weinstein was one of the most prominent donation gatherers for Hillary Clinton's candidation campaign for the presidential elections of the USA. Another interesting journalistic article about Clinton, Farrow, and his research about Weinstein is the following linked one: https://www.insider.com/ronan-farrow-hillary-clinton-tried-to-kill-harvey-weinstein-story-2019-10 ... Both sources are not used as references in this Wikipedia article yet. --2003:E5:7714:D176:9039:5C62:BEC8:1814 (talk) 22:31, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply