Talk:Romanization of Belarusian

Examples

The examples table needs one or two more words, to demonstrate the transliteration of the letters х and й, and perhaps with ю or я at the beginning and in the middle. —Michael Z. 2006-02-13 23:32 Z

isn't it: ROMANIANIZATION of Belarusian?

I think is write in this way to mention.

Romanization means conversion to the Latin (Roman) alphabet. Romanianization, or Rumanization, is something else. —Michael Z. 2006-02-14 22:39 Z

Anonymous, I reverted your revert to an earlier version. My original edit summary covered the problems with table formatting, but I didn't mention some other problems: that the new location of note references changed the scope of the notes which applied specifically to Łacinka, and not to the Cyrillic letters in general, and that the table formatting made the main article headings pile up on the right side of the tables in my web browser (Safari/Mac). —Michael Z. 2006-02-14 22:51 Z

I don't understand the reason of the undeletion. The message I deleted wasn't based on any official info, was misleading and promotional. None of the other systems' entries carry a promotional message with them. This isn't a comparison of systems but an index. So why undeletion? Yury Tarasievich 21:30, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Question

Could someone help? Two articles (BGN/PCGN romanization of Belarusian and Romanization of Belarusian) contain different information regarding Ь (ь). By the first article this latter should be converted to "’" (apostrophe), but according to the second article — not. Ang15 (talk) 19:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

According to the source, the soft sign in the BGN/PCGN romanization system should be represented by an apostrophe.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); August 24, 2011; 19:58 (UTC)

I'll correct the table then. Ang15 (talk) 20:04, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Romanization of Belarusian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130213212545/http://earth-info.nga.mil/gns/html/romanization.html to http://earth-info.nga.mil/gns/html/romanization.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425150217/http://misternet.livejournal.com/14074.html to http://misternet.livejournal.com/14074.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Romanization of Belarusian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090824062135/http://unstats.un.org/unsd/geoinfo/9th-UNCSGN-Docs/E-CONF-98-CRP-21.pdf to http://unstats.un.org/unsd/geoinfo/9th-uncsgn-docs/e-conf-98-crp-21.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:19, 22 January 2018 (UTC)