Talk:Roman influence in Caucasian Albania

Latest comment: 7 years ago by LouisAragon in topic Issues

Untitled edit

The area of actual Azerbaijan occupied by Armenian forces should be included in the article? The Amaras Monastery is to be considered in Armenia?--6graytrucks (talk) 22:05, 7 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

What Azebaijan, there was no Azerbaijan in roman times, the article should be renamed Caucasian Albania without Azerbaijan. Maybe we should write Italian Empire (Roman Empire). Hardly.--2492BC (talk) 12:15, 14 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Banned users edit

The two users having a conversation above are both banned, and so is User:Qyork who performed the move to the Azerbaijan title. I moved it to Roman influence in Caucasian Albania which should be more sane given that the main article is called Caucasian Albania. Have mörser, will travel (talk) 22:36, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Roman influence edit

What Roman influence, at the time when Armenia was baptized by Gregory the Illuminator in 301 AD, who wasn't from Rome was pagan. The sentence must be corrected.--Armenia Magna (talk) 17:38, 27 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Roman influence in modern-day Azerbaijan is practically non-existent. Christianity is a minority religion and was not brought by the Roman Empire since it was not a Christian state when it held Caucasian Albania as a vassal. And the Latin alphabet currently used in Azerbaijan is not a legacy of Rome but of Soviet rule. If using the Latin alphabet is proof of Roman influence then one might as well talk of Roman influence on Vietnam or Indonesia. I have edited the article accordingly, but I fear it will eventually be edited back by whoever wrote that nonsense.89.121.160.79 (talk)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Roman influence in Caucasian Albania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:09, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Issues edit

This article contains numerous factual errors, some of which are loaded with OR. I've adressed several of them, by removing/tweaking the most ludicrous statements, and those that were tagged for a long time. However there's still lots to be done. - LouisAragon (talk) 16:56, 30 April 2017 (UTC)Reply