Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Messina-Lipari-Santa Lucia del Mela

Maps

Two maps containing the same relevant information were not needed. I deleted the less informative map, and moved the more informative map to the Infobox. --Vicedomino (talk) 22:52, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Links to Catholic-Hierarchy

The list at Catholic-Hierarchy is not referenced. It can't count as a reference in this article. The ref. attached to every archbishop should be deleted, and a sentence at the beginning of the section should point to Catholic-Hierarchy and/or GCatholic. There are reference books (Eubel, Ritzler) which address this problem. --Vicedomino (talk) 22:57, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Early Middle Ages records...spurious or at least in disarray?

Some of the ecclesiastical post records during the Early Middle Ages by the source given for it seem tenuous and off, for example the bishop for 603 AD was a "Guglielmo I". Now obviously this was a post-hoc Italianized form of a Medieval Latin Gulielmus or other spelling variant. However at this time Sicily was under the Eastern Roman Empire for quite some time relatively speaking, and the Ostrogoths had only held Italy for a short time before Justinian's Gothic Wars took a lot of it back. Furthermore it's odd this is the first name of ultimately Germanic origin, while all the names of Bishops under the Gothic kingdom are all of Latin or Latinized Greek origin. How can this be? Not only that, we don't see another Germanic name until "Roberto" in 1081 when the Normans took Sicily from the Arabs.

I suppose my main problem here is checking the veracity of these names from this turbulent period where Italy's vicissitude is bound to create nebulous records. I don't like how some names are Latinized and some are Italianized. For a heuristic solution, either make it all Ecclesiastical Latin (my preference), all post-hoc Italian, or all native names, where Guglielmo would be most likely in Gothic, unless he was a Romanized or Hellenized citizen of Gothic ancestry. Right now I find the list to be in irritating disarray.--Sıgehelmus (Talk) |д=) 18:14, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

I agree with your irritation. The original list on the English page, annotated by Patapsco913, was obviously copied from the Italian Wikipedia page; hence the Italian version of the names. The work of Gabriel Chow (of GCatholic) is also involved for purposes of annotation, and, though enthusiastic, it is uncritical. But somewhere in the transmission of lists, an unreliable source or two failed to distinguish between Messina in Sicily and Messene in Greece. Also, Vicars Capitular were mistaken for actual bishops. What should one do? Eliminate the incorrect names, or flag them as mistakes? I have been flagging them in notes, so that some well-meaning but ignorant person does not reintroduce them. Gams tried to eliminate the obviously wrong names, but he is ignored. --Vicedomino (talk) 21:30, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Messina-Lipari-Santa Lucia del Mela. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170202234624/http://www.dilietoangelo.it/chiese%20greche%20ed%20emigrazioni%20di%20vescovi%20amalfitani.htm to http://www.dilietoangelo.it/chiese%20greche%20ed%20emigrazioni%20di%20vescovi%20amalfitani.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:54, 22 September 2017 (UTC)