Talk:Rolls-Royce Trent
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Marc Lacoste in topic Why is the UltraFan covered here?
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rolls-Royce Trent article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
ANTLE was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 23 April 2019 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Rolls-Royce Trent. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Why is the UltraFan covered here?
editThe UltraFan has much different architecture than the Trent. Besides incorporating a reduction gearbox for the fan, the UltraFan doesn't have a free power turbine like the Trents do. Rolls Royce seems to treat it as a totally different engine, so the UltraFan section should probably be moved to its own page. D271l (talk) 05:41, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- The UltraFan is presented as a Trent successor. Maybe it could span a new family with a new name, or its technology could be included in the Trent Family. Anyway, it could have its own page, feel free to move it to a new page. Cheers--Marc Lacoste (talk) 06:24, 19 May 2023 (UTC)