This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Roland de Vaux is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Re "De Vaux chose not to publish a definitive archaeological report for his work at Qumran despite worldwide interest, though he left behind him copious notes, which have been synthesized into a single volume and published in 2003.", can you give the book and author names? Ofrahod (talk) 09:21, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The following comment was a HTML comment following the lede. I have moved it here for better exposure, and removed it from the article.--DThomsen8 (talk) 20:04, 25 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
<!-- Polemical comment out of place in a biog. entry: The association of the archaeological site, the caves and the scrolls with the [[Essene]] sect of [[Judaism]], long held to be warranted, is now under re-evaluation by a number of biblical scholars and [[archaeologists]]. -->
