March 2009 edit

This page reads like it was lifted wholesale from another source - perhaps from an earlier version of http://www.rdprgroup.com as I get Google hits for phrases from the article directing to this page. The tone of the (rather purple prose-like) writing reads like one long, indulgently-written puff piece. Roja Dove is obviously worthy of a Wiki entry, but this is not really a Wiki entry. I only passed through to correct a typo, and don't know anything about the subject to start rewriting it, but have flagged it to try and bring it to someone's attention. Mabalu (talk) 10:49, 9 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've just reverted this article to the previous version from before the (plagiarised?) puff piece was dumped here, with a small revision to a bit that read like an advertisement. Mabalu (talk) 11:01, 9 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Swathes of legitimate "citation required" deleted - I wonder who by? edit

As the user above points out, this page has very serious problems and reads more like an advert than it does a Wikipedia page. The vast majority if not all references are to "celebrity" or "biographical" news articles, often sourcing the info itself nowhere other than Mr Dove's claims. Claims, for instance, that Roja Dove attended Cambridge university are completely unsubstantiated - as far as I know the university records do not place Dove at the uni at the time. Yet every edit where /citation required/ is added tends to get replaced by another sensationalist internet story as evidence. One can only assume that Mr Dove has very good PR, and that they have a penchant for monitoring closely this page such that they can revert any changes back to the narrative that they desire to tell about this individual. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hs68 (talkcontribs) 13:05, 16 April 2018 (UTC)Reply