Talk:Rodney Croome
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Article tone edit
He fronted the long, bitter and ultimately successful campaign to decriminalise homosexuality in Tasmania, which until May 1, 1997 was a criminal offense punishable by up to 25 years jail.
Is "long, bitter and ultimately successful" an encyclopedic tone?
Also, is there anything in wikipedia about Tasmania's laws about homosexuality? Was it always illegal until 97, or was it illegal, then legal, then illegal? Andjam 08:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC) (Crossed out by Andjam 13:20, 18 June 2006 (UTC))
- Sigh. Frankly, I can't see anything wrong with the article except that I happened to comment on it to someone else. Rebecca 08:17, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- Tasmania (along with all the other states) used to have laws making sodomy a crime. Tasmania kept the laws until much more recently, and getting them removed was particularly bitter down there. Croome, along with Nick Toonen, took the laws to the UN and won, and prompted intervention by the Keating government to enact laws implementing the UN's recommendations. If the Tasmanian government hadn't dropped their prosecutions against them (making the issue moot), the case may well have been massive. I should write some more about that at some point. --bainer (talk) 12:26, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the background. My objection wasn't on the grounds that the case wasn't long, hard and bitter, just that it didn't sound encyclopedic. If you can give details on the longness, the hardness and the bitterness, that'd be great. Andjam 13:20, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Rodney Croome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110206023523/http://www.samesame.com.au/25/2009/ to http://www.samesame.com.au/25/2009
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151003062218/http://www.samesame.com.au/features/10228/Letter-to-protesters-Withdraw-this-hateful-poster-now to http://www.samesame.com.au/features/10228/Letter-to-protesters-Withdraw-this-hateful-poster-now
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:32, 20 December 2017 (UTC)