Talk:Rocky Mountain National Park/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Early comment
Moved from article (belongs here):
- Amateur photos to be added soon...
—Frecklefoot 15:17, 1 August 2003 (UTC)
Destubbing
FWIW, I'm beginning an effort to destub this article, feel free to contribute/change as necessary Adagio 15:20, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Removal of links
The link to Rocky Mountain National Park at National Parks Gallery was removed by User:Pschemp claiming it was "link spam." The link is very high quality, and contains an abundance of useful and relevant content. It's also interesting to note that the link to TerraGalleria remains, which is most definitely a commercial site, and was one of a great many links added by a single user (which you'd think would also be considered to be "link spam" - not that I do). Npgallery 20:09, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- To the people using IP addresses to re-add these links, please do not. They are considered linkspam. See User_talk:Npgallery/Archive1. Nationalparks 23:30, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- No, they're not. What is spam is your personal page at MIT that promotes "get paid to read email" programs. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.33.162.63 (talk • contribs) .
- Keep in mind that this is Wikipedia, not my personal website. I have never spammed my personal site to anyone. (Why do I even have to defend my non-Wiki actions here?) Every person who commented on the mediation cabal that User:Npgallery began agreed that these links are spam. I have started an entry at the village pump, here. Nationalparks 04:36, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Ugh -- my definition of "linkspam" is a lot less strict than many here (that is, I'd allow a lot more links than many others), but when a cite has a huge, migraine-inducing throbbing add covring the entire left side of the main page, to the point where I couldn't even stand to stick around to see if the site had any valid content or not -- then it doesn't belong in Wikipedia. --Rehcsif 04:34, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Locator dot
Anyone else think the locator dot seems a little too far north? The precise dot location might be browser dependent. Looking at it with Safari, the top edge of the dot is touching the Wyoming border. -- Rick Block (talk) 05:12, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- On my Internet Explorer the dot has a number of pixels clearance from the WY border, but on my Netscape, it does overlap the border. Nationalparks 05:24, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Photos of dubious value
Billy Hathorn's recently added photos don't strike me as helping the article much; most are run-of-the-mill personal snapshots. Any value in keeping them? -- Elphion (talk) 18:11, 21 September 2010 (UTC)