Talk:Rock and Roll All Nite

Latest comment: 3 months ago by SFandLogicReader in topic Anything on the on-purpose misspelling?

Rock and Roll All Nite

edit

This article needs to be cleaned up for clarity purposes. The studio verson of the single only charted at #68 (I think). It was the live version of the single from Alive! that became a big hit for the band, not the studio version. The article should point that out so that the reader doesn't get confused by the information.

As a suggestion, I would think that it would be beneficial to list both singles in the article and distinguish the respective chart success between the two and the history of the song itself. Darwin's Bulldog 20:07, 7 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Title

edit

The title was changed to "Rock 'n Roll All Nite" when the correct title of the page (and of the song) is "Rock And Roll All Nite." You can clearly see this in the image of the record and on the back cover of Dressed to Kill (which I have, by the way). Thoughts? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tony lion (talkcontribs) 22:59, 21 March 2007 (UTC).Reply

Guitar solo

edit

The Smashes, Thrashes & Hits version does not have a guitar solo. NewPasha 19:43, 20 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

You're right. I removed it. Relrel (talk) 15:30, 19 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal

edit

There is no reason why there needs to be a separate article for Poison's cover of this song. The information needs to be merged into this article. -Xnux the Echidna 22:39, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

image

edit

the image of the picture sleeve is some obscure import, why is it the main image used for the song? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.30.8.252 (talk) 17:03, 2 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Chart performance

edit

The chart performance section implies that the song eventually charted at number twelve when in fact that was the concert version. Can that be corrected? Wolf O'Donnel (talk) 20:52, 14 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Convoy soundtrack

edit

The version on the convoy soundtrack is not kiss 174.215.161.110 (talk) 17:19, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Anything on the on-purpose misspelling?

edit

It would be interesting. SFandLogicReader (talk) 16:14, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply