Talk:Robert Service (historian)
Latest comment: 8 years ago by My very best wishes in topic A suspicious source
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Archives: 1 |
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Untitled edit
I removed this thing because this is neither valid criticism of his work nor anything of encyclopedic value. This is just a personal squabble of two historians. My very best wishes (talk) 22:18, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
A suspicious source edit
I checked this ref. It tells about a review of the book by 14 historians. However, it does not provide any link or reference to this review. Does it really exist? Am I missing something? My very best wishes (talk) 00:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC)