Talk:Robert M. La Follette/GA1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by GhostRiver in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kncny11 (talk · contribs) 17:29, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply


Hello! I'll be reviewing this article as part of the July 2021 good article nominations backlog drive! Any section that I've marked with a   Working tag means that I haven't finished leaving comments there, but you're free to begin making changes as soon as you see them! Kncny11 (shoot) 17:29, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Infobox and lede edit

  • Per WP:LEADCITE, ledes don't normally have citations, but direct quotes should be linked, particularly the one about being "the most celebrated leader in Wisconsin history".

Early life edit

  • Comma after "in 1862"
  • Specify that he graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree
  • Also specify that the student paper was called the University Press

Early political career edit

Governor of Wisconsin edit

Senator edit

Roosevelt administration edit

  • Replace parentheses with commas in second sentence
  • "sixteen consecutive" → "16 consecutive" per MOS:NUMBERS

Taft administration edit

  • "senators except" → "senators except for"
  • Switch the "In consultation with..." and "in January 1911" clauses
  • ""and Wendell Phillips."" → ""and Wendell Phillips"." per MOS:LQ
  • Mention when exactly the autobiography came out, so we can understand how that might have affected the presidential election
  • "would undergo surgery" → "required surgery"

Wilson administration edit

  • The bit about foreign policy seems tacked on in its current state; if possible, try to expand and split into a different paragraph
  • Replace hyphen with en dash for the 373–50 vote
  • Comma after "After the U.S. declared war"
  • "during 1917 and 1918" → "throughout this period"
  • ""struggling to establish an industrial democracy."" → ""struggling to establish an industrial democracy"." per MOS:LQ

Harding administration edit

  • "La Follette retained influence in Wisconsin after the war" (or some such time qualifier)
  • Need a reference for the death date of Harding and subsequent succession by Coolidge
  • The last paragraph is a hell of a run-on sentence

1924 Presidential campaign edit

Death edit

  • Perhaps worth mentioning that the heart disease was complicated by bronchitis and pneumonia
  • WL to Forest Hill Cemetery (Madison, Wisconsin)
  • Also mention that he was still in office at the time of his death

Legacy edit

  • Either WL Philip and Robert in the first sentence, or don't mention their names until later
  • ""the most celebrated figure in Wisconsin history."" → ""the most celebrated figure in Wisconsin history"." per MOS:LQ

Memorials edit

  • Everything after the painting in the Senate is currently unreferenced

References edit

  • There is currently an awkward split on the Bibliography side, where at first glance it looks like there are no specialty studies. It might be preferable to use column tags rather than reflist tags here
  • On that note, the bibliography section should probably be called "Further reading", as "Bibliography" is usually used for what you have listed as "Works cited"

General comments edit

  • Broadness, focus, neutrality, and stability all shake out
  • Pictures are available for use and are relevant to the article
  • Mention somewhere in the body how he came by the nickname "Fighting Bob"
  • Include the years in which he was governor and senator in the headers for those respective sections
  • Earwig score looks good at 32.9%, with the higher ones coming from direct, attributed quotes. I also spot checked some of the offline sources.

Great work so far! Mostly just small MOS things and a few silly mistakes that happen with an article of this length. Putting on hold now, and let me know if you have any questions! Kncny11 (shoot) 19:44, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

No changes made to article in over a week. Only activity from user since April has been two RfA votes. Closing this one as a fail, unfortunately. — GhostRiver 01:21, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply