Talk:Robert J. White

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 98.38.155.134 in topic untitled

untitled edit

Anyone think it should be mentioned that Bob White was also a medical ethics advisor for Pope John II? I can not find a primary source to support this, but I know there is a lot of secondary info out there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.138.73.76 (talkcontribs) 00:36, 8 November 2005

I'm nominating this article for a POV check - there's some egregious editorializing on the ethics of head/body transplantation, not to mention the hints that reasonable people should be repulsed by the idea. topynate (talk) 17:47, 22 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

i say it needs no pov check, transplants were useless and cruel — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.38.155.134 (talk) 01:47, 19 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

I fixed a bit of the POV on the article (Looked through the 4 references to make sure I deleted the right stuff). The page has 4 references which verifys the contents on the article. If someone have the time to look through and do the proper inline citation it would make this article much better. Thanks. kev098 (talk) 23:53, 23 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

is this a hoax? edit

If this actually occurred, I presume there were publications that can document it. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 04:37, 17 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

I suppose it isn't, goes back too far. As far the process is concerned, this would really work best with a clone engineered to not have a brain or maybe just the lower brain structures. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 04:43, 17 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Rather what? edit

The transplant would offer options to those individuals, who would rather be quadriplegic than dead.

Shouldn't that be "rather be dead than quadriplegic"? --TotempaaltJ (talk) 15:59, 13 January 2011 (UTC) no it is correct in its origonal form, as the brain is not connected to the spinal cord after this operation onloy to a blood suppliy thus if the other body was about to die, you could undergo something like this which would keep you alive but would be paralised as a result. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.195.83.3 (talk) 16:48, 27 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

900 publications edit

He may have has his name on 900 publications, but he sure as hell can't have written all of them. What a goddamn piece of work!!!88.110.123.140 (talk) 23:04, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

raymond (fishing) white edit

my favourite fish is trout — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.17.153.46 (talk) 00:05, 4 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Robert J. White. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:48, 7 January 2018 (UTC)Reply