Talk:Robert Hamilton Mathews
Latest comment: 5 years ago by NSH001 in topic Quality better than stub-class
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Robert Hamilton Mathews article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Quality better than stub-class edit
This article is presently rated stub-class, but I think it's better than that. Having just reviewed this page's recent edit history and the list of criteria for the different classes, I suggest this article needs re-rating to C-class, or possibly even B-class. Comments? yoyo (talk) 18:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Yahya Abdal-Aziz, it's obviously not a stub. I prefer not to rate articles in which I've had significant input. I suggest you go through the list of criteria for B-class, and if you think it satisfies all of them, rate it as B-class. --NSH001 (talk) 07:18, 21 June 2018 (UTC)