| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Father? edit
In what regards the first paragraph of this article:
I think it is rather inappropriate to refer to this man as an "Australian father", given the circunstances and the natures of his crime. "Australian convict" would make more sense, yet the the same sentence already used the word "convicted", so it might sounds repetitive. Perhaps "(...) an Australia convict" and then "sentenced" instead of "convicted"?
Just a thought.
193.63.81.79 10:30, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Hmm? 'Convict' is never used in modern-day Australia to describe a prisoner. It's reserved for prisoners in the colonial era. Eligius (talk) 16:07, 15 October 2010 (UTC)