| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Photo edit
Is there any particular reason why this article features an elaborate digital composite of SEVEN photographs rather than just a photograph of the subject? I have no way to tell if this artistic interpretation is at all close to what the man looks like. Alvis 05:32, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
It is close -- which is amazing given the oddness of combining photos. Nonetheless, I'd much prefer a single photograph as well.--75.34.27.156 (talk) 22:00, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
If you need a picture surely go for those available from the Nobel site anyhow. The one with him in front of a cafe called ARCH might be the most appropraite :D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.196.65.121 (talk) 20:31, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- Added a new high res profile image Chrionexfleckeri1350 (talk) 19:34, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating edit
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:48, 28 August 2007 (UTC)