control of upper house edit

I believe that the libs/nats etc lost control of the Leg council, briefly, in the mid 80s--please disabuse me Eric A. Warbuton 05:19, 12 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

I've checked sources, and you're basically right. The result at the 1985 election was particularly close, and there was a tied vote in Nunawading Province. It was initially considered won by the ALP, but the Court of Disputed Returns declared the outcome void, and the Liberals won the resulting by-election either one or three months later (conflicting sources). If that is counted, then 2002 was the second time Labor has gained control of the Legislative Council. Ambi 06:17, 12 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Good bloke! edit

Great pollie. Will be a loss to the Community.

Frozen ... why? edit

Hi.

Can we unfreeze this page? Some of us have valid contributions to make.

This article has been blocked to edits from IP addresses due to persistent non-neutral Point of View edits made from anonymous IP addresses. If you wish to contribute you can create a Wikipedia user name and then edit the page logged on as a user.
An article which clearly, accurately, and fairly describes all the major points of view will, by definition, be in accordance with Wikipedia's official "Neutral Point of View" policy. See WP:POV and WP:NPOV for more details. Also note that all contributions to talk pages such as this should be signed by entering 4 tildes "~" as the end of your comments Peter C Talk! 01:35, 9 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
For the record, edits by the above anon were the reason this article was frozen in the first place. Ambi 02:03, 9 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
These edits were mentioned in the Diary section of The Age today (11 May):
"Online encyclopedia Wikipedia can be edited by anyone. It's a wealth of knowledge on a broad range of topics. Did we mention that anyone can edit it? As Victorian Liberal leader Robert Doyle was resigning in favour of Ted Baillieu, his online entry was being updated in a manner that would have stretched Encyclopedia Britannica's standards of objectivity. Until he "nobly" resigned, he served Victoria with "aplomb, charisma and energy", the page said. "More leaders like Mr Doyle are required to rail against the spin and economic mismanagement of the Bracks Government." Hey, they make a point. Then again, the person writing it is spinning an online encyclopedia entry. The effusiveness has since been deleted, but the mind whirls."
I've added it to Wikipedia:Press coverage. --Canley 03:15, 11 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Unfreeze edit

How about unfreezing this page so others can contribute?

You know why it frozen. You edits landed yourself a gig on the Melbourne Age. :) ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 00:58, 16 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
NOTE: The page is not frozen to edits for Wikipedia users so create a profile and you can start editing Peter C Talk! 03:02, 16 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

You know it, Review Me. I got onto the backpage of the Age. More than you'll ever get, Review Me. Tool.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 130.194.13.103 (talkcontribs) 15:51, 29 May 2006.

WikiProject class rating edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:48, 28 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Robert Doyle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:33, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Victorian Liberal leaders who did not become Premier edit

“Napthine and Baillieu eventually became Premiers and it meant that Doyle along with Alan Brown have been the only Liberal leaders to have never won an election.”

That is incorrect as it did not take into account, due to when it was written, non-elected Liberal Premiers Lindsay Thompson and Naphthine who were both voted out without being elected in their own right. This plus the fact that Brown neither won or lost an election as Liberal leader. The statement was about Liberal leaders who did not become Premiers and this club recently got a new member in Matthew Guy. 122.106.83.10 (talk) 00:55, 12 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Why hasn't this mistake been corrected. 122.106.83.10 (talk) 16:45, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

I've removed the passage, not much point if the group is getting larger, but you could have made the edit yourself. --Canley (talk) 02:39, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
Oh OK, no you couldn't, it is semi-protected. --Canley (talk) 02:42, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

"no longer true"

Wasn't true in the first place.122.106.83.10 (talk) 02:59, 29 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome. --Canley (talk) 03:14, 29 March 2019 (UTC)Reply