Talk:Roads and freeways in metropolitan Phoenix/GA1

GA Review

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Kurumi and AARoads I do not believe are reliable sources, ref 18-21 are the exact same link, use named references to avoid duplication.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Suggest asking the Maps Task Force for a map for the article, maybe a few more images, because just having US 60 with an image seems odd
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

--Admrb♉ltz (tclog) 04:01, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Failing GA after 6 days of no improvements. --Admrb♉ltz (tclog) 15:49, 26 August 2008 (UTC)Reply