Talk:Road to Europe/GA2

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Grapple X in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GRAPPLE X 23:56, 12 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    Very few niggles here.
    "...mere jaded actors" -> "merely"
    Chattanooga Choo Choo should be in quotation marks as it's a song title, as "Chattanooga Choo Choo".
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    MOS is fine.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
    References are mostly fine. I'd like to see the date of writing/publication for the websites cited, though, but that's about it.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
    Scope here is fine, no problems with it.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Neutral
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
    Stable
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    Images are fine. Two commons, so no worries with those, and the FUR for the screenshot seems solid.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    Changes are slight, so I'm going to do them myself and put this through as a pass when I'm done. Well done!