Talk:River Tone

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Bob1960evens in topic Link rot

What else is needed before a GA nomination? edit

What else do people think would be needed before this article would meet the good article criteria?— Rod talk 20:21, 25 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on River Tone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:36, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on River Tone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:13, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

EA river levels edit

Since all of the EA river level links were broken, I have created an EAlevel template, which links (I think) to the data that was formerly linked. It means that the next time the EA urls change, we only have to alter the template, and all the links should work again. EA are notorious for changing and/or binning stuff on their websites. Bob1960evens (talk) 09:19, 29 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

UKCEH mean flow data edit

All of the UKCEH mean flow data links were also broken. I have created a UKCEHflow template, which links to the data that was formerly linked. It means that the next time the UKCEH urls change, we only have to alter the template, and all the links should work again. Bob1960evens (talk) 09:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Link rot edit

I have replaced 17 reference urls, because they were dead and were not on the Wayback machine, including the EAlevel data and the UKCEH flow data. For the Current Ecological Quality (3 refs) I have now linked to the EA Catchment data, which I think gives the same imformation. The dead links to Curry and Hay Moors SSSI and Southlake Moors SSSI have been replaced, but both paragraphs are made up of copies of whole sentences from the citations, so I have added a copyright violation tag to them. Please feel free to address this issue before I do, as it may take me a while to get round to it. Bob1960evens (talk) 12:45, 29 December 2020 (UTC)Reply