This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Waterways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of UK Waterways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UK WaterwaysWikipedia:WikiProject UK WaterwaysTemplate:WikiProject UK WaterwaysUK Waterways articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
No objection to a merge myself - and indeed expansion of the article to more fully treat the Rother and each of its tributaries. I arrived here by a circuitous route involving a link pipe-titled 'River Line' taking me to a page all about a geological SSSI (River Line (East Sussex)) and not about the tributary at all. So let's put the Brede, Line and Tillingham rivers in with the Rother. cheers Geopersona (talk) 06:07, 8 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
I object to a merge. There is plenty of information around about the Brede, and the River Rother, East Sussex article would be far too cluttered if it had to have several sections on the Brede as well. Bob1960evens (talk) 22:45, 30 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
