Talk:Ritual (Tiësto, Jonas Blue and Rita Ora song)/GA1
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Kyle Peake in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 09:50, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
I will get on with this right away! --K. Peake 09:50, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Infobox and lead edit
Should dance really be included as a genre in the infobox if dance-pop is already?Wouldn't "in various countries" be more appropriate right after the formats?"it was met with a warm reception" → "the song received a warm reception""the music of the song and" → "the music of it and""including in Canada, Norway," → "including Canada, Norway,"Poland should come before the certification body in that sentencePipe neon light to Neon lighting
Background and composition edit
"Few days prior its release," → "A few days prior its release,"Mention in the release sentence that it was for digital download and streaming in various countriesThe duration is not sourcedAgain, should dance be mentioned as a genre if dance-pop already is?
Reception edit
Maybe merge this with the below section and retitle to Reception and promotion per that being only one para?"to blend "driving instrumentals [...]" → "to blend a "driving instrumental [...]""ready to dance."" → "ready to dance"." per MOS:QUOTE"kickstart the weekend" → "kickstart your weekend" per the source's wording"foresaw it "to reign supreme in clubs" → "foresaw it as "destined to rule clubs" per above"it peaked at number 13" → "the song peaked at number 13"
Music video edit
Pipe neon lights to Neon lighting"Ora's appearance, stating that "she's" → "Ora's appearance, stating: "She's"
Track listing edit
Should acoustic really be capitalised?
Charts edit
- Good
Certifications edit
- Good
Release history edit
- Good
References edit
- Copyvio score looks great at 23.1%!!!
Pipe Billboard to Billboard (magazine) on ref 6Cite Musicnotes.com as publisher instead on ref 8Wikilink The Music Network on ref 10Wikilink Rolling Stone on ref 13Remove HRT from brackets on ref 20Should OCC really be in brackets on ref 76?
Final comments and verdict edit
- On hold until all of the issues are fixed; that went smoothly as expected! --K. Peake 11:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hey @Kyle Peake: long time no see :D. Everything was addressed and thanks for the review! Iaof2017 (talk) 15:02, 17 February 2023 (UTC)