Talk:Ristorante Machiavelli/GA1

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Another Believer in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 08:53, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply


Hi, I'll be reviewing this GAN as part of the ongoing GAN backlog drive. --Vacant0 (talk) 08:53, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:29, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  

Initial comments

edit

General comments

edit

Final comments

edit

Luckily enough, @Another Believer:, there is not much to fix. I'll leave the article on hold for a week and promote it once the issues get addressed. Cheers, --Vacant0 (talk) 21:37, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for reviewing! Please let me know if any concerns remain. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:45, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
I agree with all your comments above; if there is no information on why it experienced a staffing shortage in 2021 it should be kept as it is in the article. Promoting this to GA then.
P.S. this kind of a GAN is interesting to read. Vacant0 (talk) 21:49, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! I've also nominated Bipartisan Cafe, if you're interested in a similar entry. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:50, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.