Talk:Rinko Kikuchi

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Meatsgains in topic Former image was bad but this is even worse

Charaters in the "Filmography" Section edit

Call me crazy, but shouldn't the characters she played by listed on her filmography? You know, in addition too or instead of the directors? Just saying. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.36.167.135 (talk) 22:43, 23 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Article image edit

Please can we get a better picture for this page? This is a very unflattering photo of her. Metalmunki81 (talk) 12:00, 22 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

awards in filmography edit

I think it's a bit silly to include her awards/nominations for each role in the filmography table, especially since there is an Awards and nominations table that reiterates all this information. The list for Babel just clutters the table and takes up too much space. Perhaps if the Notes column didn't consume so much horizontal space, her roles in each film could be listed in the table instead. ~ Boomur [] 17:56, 19 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Beautiful edit

Has she ever done any modelling?
--Atikokan (talk) 04:40, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

He/She is not b.! Why should he or she do modelling? He or she looks like a boy on the picture. Even I look better than him or her.

Former image was bad but this is even worse edit

(RfC withdrawn)

Should the picture in the lead be changed? --Mr. Magoo and McBarker (talk) 12:46, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • Comment I think it's awful. Obvious surprise shot, with her looking like a deer in headlights. I think for some reason her jaw's a bit jutted in the shot as well; try pushing your chin forward and you get the idea. I suggest finding a new, better image for the article. --Mr. Magoo and McBarker (talk) 12:46, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment - Definitely not a great picture. Though it is a clear shot with her looking directly into the camera, she was caught off guard. We are limited in the images we have to choose from. Meatsgains (talk) 16:19, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Threaded discussion edit

 

Is the image to the right any better? Meatsgains (talk) 16:19, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

I think it's much better. Since this is a minor matter I'll replace the picture immediately. Due to the nature of the RfC I'll have to withdraw it as it would make little sense anymore after the replacement. Thank you again for your help. This is what RfCs are made for. --Mr. Magoo and McBarker (talk) 16:27, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
I don't see any users opposing the replacement. However, I've watchlisted the page and will keep my eyes out for anyone who would like to discuss the recent changes. Meatsgains (talk) 18:20, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply