Talk:Rilla of Ingleside

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
edit

I temporary reverted the edition because the copyright status of the photo taken from Flikr Web page is not clear. Unless these are not declared to be licence under Creative Commons, I believe it can't use for Wikipedia. Please read following talk.

Also see Help / FAQ / Photos http://www.flickr.com/help/photos/#87

you are automatically granted copyrights to your photos.

However, the nonprofit Creative Commons offers six default licenses as an alternative to full copyright so you can choose the one that best suits your needs.

The image http://static.flickr.com/96/234898437_e367f348e8_o.jpg was tagged as "Non-free", it's suspicious that this photo was really licensed under Creative Commons by person who post it. I will back the edition as soon as the photo is clearly explained to be contains no copyright problem. -- Tolena (talk) 12:16, 26 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I´m trying to contribute, but as I´m not a native English speaker, I do not know whether I understood everything right how to edit here... I just want to mention, however, that the article carries a misinformation: [1]. The foreshadowing of Walter´s death in "Anne of Ingleside" is NOT by the dream of the piper. The piper image by Walter appears in "Rainbow Village" (Book 7). In "Anne of Ingleside", there is a scene of the future fate of Walter being touched. Anne watches her sons sleeping, and Walter is kind of "marked" by a cross on the wall above him, a shadow of the window in the moonlight. If someone could fix that bit in the article, just for accuracy´s sake, I´d be grateful. Thanks! (Kittymum (talk) 15:11, 10 August 2014 (UTC))Reply

References

  1. ^ (In her later book Anne of Ingleside, set many years before this one, Montgomery inserts a foreshadowing in which the child Walter imagines for his friends and siblings "the piper" calling them all from their beloved Rainbow Valley.)

Why was the book trimmed?

edit

The article mentions that for many year only a severely edited version of the novel was available, until only a few years ago in fact. What was cut and why? This is important information that is left out of this article. 68.146.52.234 (talk) 20:10, 26 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Rilla of Ingleside/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Librivox (free public domain audio) version available here: http://librivox.org/rilla-of-ingleside-by-lucy-maud-montgomery/ 74.135.74.243 06:39, 29 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 06:39, 29 October 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 04:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rilla of Ingleside. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:24, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply