This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Latest comment: 6 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion
An I/p changed scheme to policy suggesting the former had negative connotations. However this is HMG's own term. JRPG (talk) 12:43, 25 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Give the impact right to buy continues to have on homelessness and council housing stock, how could anyone on the waiting list have anything other than negative connotations and opinions about the scheme? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.166.244 (talk) 10:05, 18 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
The scheme is ideologically driven, i.e. reduce public housing when the needs are not calculated. I am not in Britain and looked at this article to see how this is managed. The discounts are too high and the proceeds are not put in new housing or infrastructure because some people have the idea it is not a government thing to help people being housed.
It is quite similar in all the other 5eyes countries. While there is some evidence that people now acknowledge that the ideology looked good on paper only, the next step, revising this scheme, is not yet discussed. I had believed such a scheme was about recycling the assets, sell some, build new, then sell these and build new. 2001:8003:A070:7F00:D5FC:DE13:550C:2F0D (talk) 02:16, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
